« BLOOD NOTES - THE CASE RESUMES | Main | The Morning Session is Over - Ho Hum »

Addendum to my Tuesday Post

As Published On
The Out-Lawyer’s Blog: http://www.jaygaskill.com/blog1
And
The Policy Think Site: http://www.jaygaskill.com
All contents, unless otherwise indicated are
Copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 by Jay B. Gaskill
Permission to publish, distribute or print all or part of this article (except for personal use) is needed. [Permission for use in group discussions is almost always routinely given.]
Please contact Jay B. Gaskill, attorney at law, via e mail at law@jaygaskill.com

 

ADDENDUM

See “BLOOD NOTES”, below for the earlier testimony today.  In the late afternoon, these additional points emerged.

·        Nina’s disreputable boyfriend, Mr. Sturgeon, gave a DNA sample and there was no forensic trace of his presence at the Exeter house or in the CRX.

·        The blood on the sleeping bag cover that matched Nina’s DNA was hard to see at first. As OPD criminalist, Shannon Cavness, observed: “It was really hard to see without high-intensity lighting.”

·        That blood trace was six inches long, more  a smear than a drop or speck, it would seem.  Reportedly the jury gave this evidence their intense attention.

But the blood on the post near the entryway in the Exeter house was obvious. “It's very bright red” said Cavness said. DNA confirmed that blood came from both Hans and Nina.  When challenged whether the recovered DNA came from blood, the criminalist responded: "I doubt that someone licked this pillar."

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://jaygaskill.com/blog-mt2/mt-tb.fcgi/120


Hosting by Yahoo!

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)