MY FINAL COMMENTS ON THIS TRIAL WILL FOLLOW SOON...
JBG
Posted by U2RGood on April 28, 2008 08:16 PM|Permalink
Comments
The trial attorney almost never handles the appeal and DB certainly will not in this case.
Jay
In the paper I noticed Dubois said " I expect my client will appeal." Interesting choice of words. He could have said " I fully intend to appeal this erroneous verdict." But he didn't say that. He said my client which implies that he will not be handling the appeal. What do you think Jay? Will Dubois be staying on for the appeal or will Reiser get someone new?
The California test for insanity (as a defense in a criminal case) is almost impossible to meet. HR would (in order to meet the test) have not known the 'nature and quality of his acts" and not to be able to distinguish right and wrong. The cover-up activitues virtually disprove insanity.
JBG
To this particular person, hopefully in the 'mainstream' of society, Hans's behaviour, both on and off the stand, seems to so utterly irrational that he can't help but wonder whether Hans is sane.
I would therefore be grateful if you would be kind enough to explain what the State of California does in order to determine that a person is, or is not, fit to plead?
Comments
The trial attorney almost never handles the appeal and DB certainly will not in this case.
Jay
In the paper I noticed Dubois said " I expect my client will appeal." Interesting choice of words. He could have said " I fully intend to appeal this erroneous verdict." But he didn't say that. He said my client which implies that he will not be handling the appeal. What do you think Jay? Will Dubois be staying on for the appeal or will Reiser get someone new?
Posted by: Ian | April 29, 2008 08:14 AM
The California test for insanity (as a defense in a criminal case) is almost impossible to meet. HR would (in order to meet the test) have not known the 'nature and quality of his acts" and not to be able to distinguish right and wrong. The cover-up activitues virtually disprove insanity.
JBG
To this particular person, hopefully in the 'mainstream' of society, Hans's behaviour, both on and off the stand, seems to so utterly irrational that he can't help but wonder whether Hans is sane.
I would therefore be grateful if you would be kind enough to explain what the State of California does in order to determine that a person is, or is not, fit to plead?
Thanks.
Posted by: Christopher | April 29, 2008 12:53 PM