POLITICAL THEATER PART THREE - ELEPHANTS AND MORE
As Published On
→The Policy Think Site: http://www.jaygaskill.com
All contents, unless otherwise indicated are
Copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 by Jay B. Gaskill
The Human Conspiracy Blog
A print version of this piece is posted at --http://jaygaskill.com/PoliticalTheaterIII.htm .
THE POLITICAL THEATER, PART III
THE CAMPAIGN NEUROSES
THOSE ELEPHANTS
1. China –
2. Islamic Jihad
3. Outsourcing America -
(1) A massive national commitment to generation four domestic nuclear energy production;
There is more to come. Stay tuned….
→The Out-Lawyer’s Blog: http://www.jaygaskill.com/blog1
→The Bridge to Being Blog: http://www.jaygaskill.com/blog2
→The Human Conspiracy Blog: http://www.jaygaskill.com/blog3→The Policy Think Site: http://www.jaygaskill.com
All contents, unless otherwise indicated are
Copyright © 2005, 2006, 2007 and 2008 by Jay B. Gaskill
Permission to publish, distribute or print all or part of this article (except for personal use) is needed. [Permission for use in group discussions is almost always routinely given.]
Please contact Jay B. Gaskill, attorney at law, via e mail at law@jaygaskill.com
The Human Conspiracy Blog
January 17, 2008
A print version of this piece is posted at --http://jaygaskill.com/PoliticalTheaterIII.htm .
THE POLITICAL THEATER, PART III
It seems clear beyond doubt that the republicans will have a brokered convention requiring several ballots and no small amount of horse trading before their nominee is selected. Don’t believe the conventional wisdom. This will probably be an advantage. The democrats will have nominated Hillary or Barak beforehand. This gives the GOP an opportunity to size up the opposition and nominate accordingly. The GOP convention will be great theater and – by then – the candidates and their aides decamp will be on their best behavior.
Expect a record television audience.
I don’t think it matters one whit which of the three presumed frontrunners – Rudy, Mitt or John – wins the republican nomination (or if Fred somehow gets it), provided that Hillary is nominated. The visceral opposition to another Clinton presidency is so strong among the party faithful that all ranks will close around the nominee.
And… if the GOP movers and shakers are particularly astute, Secretary Rice will be in the number two spot.
An Obama nomination is a wild card, one that would unite the democrats, turn out the base in droves, and – just possibly – carry the day. That outcome depends on the durability of theme two (Hope’s Coloring Book, below).
There are three neuroses; and there are three elephants in the smoke filled room (they are the third rail policy conundrums).
THE CAMPAIGN NEUROSES
First, let’s review the three psychological themes, those dysfunctional mind-sets that tend to distort the merits:
1 -- The P C Train Wreck –
Why the democratic race is trapped in politically correct dogma.
It was inevitable that identity politics, based on the myth of ongoing victim-hood as a political force, would pit one core democratic constituency against another. Mrs. Clinton is now trapped in the collision of her own PC dogma and raw ambition. To win the nomination, she needs to “take that upstart Senator Obama down several pegs”, but avoid a blowback from Barak’s fellow black Americans.
It remains tot be seen how much this sorry primary spectacle will tend to depress the democratic black vote in the general election. But don’t believe the analysts who think that these two candidates have reached an actual truce. The Clintons are prepared to win whatever the short term cost. Expect a victorious Clinton to offer the number two spot to Barak.
Expect the offer to be refused.
2 -- Hope’s Coloring Book -
How Barak is our projection screen.
Politics is just like one of those failed romances when the disenchanted lover is drawn to someone who appears by virtue of apparent contrast to have all of the virtues in which the Ex was so deficient. It is human nature to project unreasonable hopes and expectations onto the unknown new lover or fresh candidate. This is why, in almost every case, the initial favorable poll numbers for that charismatic fresh face tend to erode, once the actual positions and track record of the candidate are better known. But the contrast effect is a powerful aphrodisiac. That was how we got Jimmie Carter - that aw shucks peanut farmer - instead of the competent, but tainted “business as usual” Gerald Ford.
3 Character Envy –
Could Perfection be Romney’s Achilles’ Heel?
Don’t for a minute think that we voters are comfortable with someone who seems actually to be morally superior to the rest of us. Yes, we are willing to tolerate some virtue in our presidents, but we find ourselves irritated, put off and, yes, a little afraid when confronted with really virtuous leaders. The problem has gotten worse in the post WW II culture as cynical members of the intelligentsia have worked overtime to tear down our popular heroes. We profess (and actually entertain) admiration for leaders we can “actually look up to”. But, in general, people detest judgmental moralists and fear moral examination (whether threatened or real).
Did I suggest that we are consistent? Recall the topic – we’re talking neurosis here.
Enter Mitt Romney, the virtuous Mormon with perfect hair, a perfect marriage and a perfect family. And – worse still -- he’s not a victim. Two things are happening, psychologically speaking:
Many voters are operating in the “too good to be true” mode, looking for the inevitable disclosure of scandal or character defect. These people are more comfortable with someone like “good ole President Bill”, a man for whom the whiff of scandal is part of the charm.
Many of the others are just waiting to be lectured to or put down because of their own failings. In part this is fallout from the hectorings of the politically correct left and the ultra moralistic right.