OBAMA AT WAR:
Bully Like a Flea – Sting Like a Butterfly
A Brutally Honest Analysis by Jay B Gaskill
This needs to be put bluntly: For Mr. Obama, national security is theater.
Mr. Obama is playing a game. In this game, the President of the United States gets to use the giant defense arsenal of the US security and military apparatus as a prop for the “grand gesture” on the world stage. Mr. Obama seems to lack the insight to realize that he is playing that game. Nor does he appear to realize that his national security posture is a self-serving story, a tale being made up as he goes along, part of the book about himself he is writing in his head (“Dreams of my Exploits”).
Our president is clueless about his own decision processes. Our president is addicted to the politics of gesture. His foreign policy is gesture politics, writ large.
Consider is how the Middle East looked before the disastrous Arab “Spring.”
The long-standing peace treaty between Egypt and Israel (negotiated with Anwar Sadat, who was later assassinated by the Muslim Brotherhood) was secure. For the first time in memory, Iraq was enjoying a stable democratic government at peace with its neighbors. The Turkish government was still secular and tolerant, enjoying the legacy of Ataturk, the father of the Turkish Republic. Of course, Iran was engaged in a duplicitous jihad strategy, building an atomic bomb capability, lying about it, supporting terror through its client state, Syria, and the jihadi Hezbollah forces supported there, and lying about that. Syria was run by Assad, a terrorist-supporting dictator operating under the false colors of a moderate dictator.
All that was before the Arab “Springtime for Jihad” emerged, full blown, a bitter parody of hope and change. Now consider the present moment.
- The fragile optimism of the Arab Spring has evaporated.
- The liberal-secular elements in the Syrian rebel forces have lost control of the revolution there. Now the Muslim Brotherhood and other radical Islamist elements are in charge.
- In Egypt, the Muslim Brotherhood swamped the first national election and installed one of its own as president of Egypt. In an Emperor’s New Clothes moment, Morsi was evicted. Of course, the Brotherhood is rioting; and our president is wringing his (metaphorical) hands.
- The Iranian nuclear bomb program is approaching the point of no return (amid more presidential hand-wringing).
- Hezbollah is now a renewed regional threat.
Let’s leave all the gestures, the spin and the blame game-aside: We face a grave threat. Wishful thinking has failed.
The US national interest does not change just because the security situation deteriorates or because POTUS chooses to ignore the facts on the ground. Consider:
- The USA, the region and the world, still need a Middle East that is no longer a terrorist incubator.
- This requires a stable and peaceful Iraq and a secure, productive Israel, at peace with the US and its neighbors.
- The bloody-minded jihadists, including the Muslim Brotherhood, remain an existential threat to our security interests, and must be marginalized.
- Iran must not be allowed to destabilize the region, and cannot be allowed to become a nuclear power.
- Syria’s role as the terror-client-of-Iran must be ended, and Hezbollah needs to be crushed.
- The pre-911 isolationism prevalent in the US is just as toxic now as it ever was.
None of our major security objectives can be attained, nor can our security situation be improved, by a few, pre-announced missile strikes on selected targets in Syria. Hezbollah will not be crushed. The Jihad will not be tamed.
The time to fruitfully intervene in the Syrian rebellion was before the Muslim Brotherhood took control of the rebels. That opportunity was squandered months ago while Mr. Obama so was absorbed in his “analytic calculations” that he failed to lead.
Either Assad will win or the radicalized rebels will. There will be hell to pay in either scenario. But going forward, we cannot allow the hostile, terror-supporting regime poised to emerge in Syria to acquire the resources to support and export terror.
History’s authentic leaders are remembered because they led. History’s temporizers and appeasers are remembered because they did not. The good leaders took the stage when the moment was ripe, and boldly implemented the measures needed to protect their country’s vital interests in a time of peril. The non-leaders punted.
Leading from behind is not leadership at all. It is a pretense.
There is one secret to coping successfully with the thuggish regimes that populate world politics. Be tougher than they are, and never bluff. Thugs can tell the difference between the feather display of an angry peacock and the warning growl of an angry lion.
Is it too late to salvage this mess? …Not at all.
No other country in history has enjoyed the ability to project massive destructive power at the distances and to the extent that US forces still can. Even in our weakened circumstances, America still has the raw military capability to bring down the regimes in Iran and Syria without deploying massive ground troops. By using air power relentlessly and without concern for the opinions of others, American military assets can readily destroy the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, most of Hezbollah’s forces, the navy and air defenses of Iran, and its major economic assets. Syria can be dealt with at the same time. The USA is still that powerful.
When American military and national security resources are credibly unleashed, ready and willing to do real damage, they are far less likely to be used.
But is it too late for this president to salvage something from this mess? That poses a question of character, judgment and courage. Can you imagine this American president seizing the moment and saving the day?
I can’t. Our president is handicapped by his own prior decisions and non-decisions, and by some innate character flaws. In a word, Mr. Obama is decision-challenged. Our adversaries – and they are legion – have Figured This Out.
No one is afraid of the United States under this president; Mr. Obama’s threats are likely to be dismissed as political posturing. Perhaps they should not be, but perceptions govern actions; and thugs are goaded on by the perception of weakness. This is one reason that the Russians did not hesitate to deploy major naval assets into the Middle East conflict region.
And it is the chief reason that weak presidents are more dangerous to the peace than strong ones.
First Published on the Policy Think Site, Copyright © 2013 by Jay B Gaskill, Attorney at Law
Permission to forward this article is granted by the author.
For comments and other permissions, contact the author via email: email@example.com
 Apologies to the legendary American boxer, Mohammed Ali (Cassius Marcellus Clay, Jr., January 17, 1942-), who famously said, “I float like a butterfly, sting like a bee.”